{ "schema": "y-theory.relational-induction-archive-reconciliation.v1", "audit_id": "RELATIONAL-INDUCTION-ARCHIVE-RECONCILIATION-2026-09-02", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-02", "review_state": "completed_candidate_reconciliation", "decision": "reject_wholesale_import_retain_hash_bound_candidate_evidence", "current_release": "YLS-2026.09.02.11", "authority_boundary": "The archives are older candidate evidence and are not installable authority. Their package labels, internal canonical placement, agent-authored prose, passing self-tests, and repeated copies do not confer current source authority, approval, or proof.", "narrative": { "path": "reports/source-reconciliation/RELATIONAL_INDUCTION_ARCHIVE_RECONCILIATION.md", "sha256": "8e849416bf8a803aea017d441b5a9e6e9f9e6f205a91e34265ee4c2605e2cde9" }, "current_author_intake": { "path": "intake/raw/YWP-20260902T004138Z-changing-oriented-relation-induces-flow.md", "sha256": "51ef1e2fa2d60d22a5e86bd48d44e8f261e8acd484216bc69d6f657ef41c56ae", "role": "direct-author candidate wisdom plus explicit acknowledgement that the wording may be incorrect" }, "archives": [ { "archive_id": "historical_sync_yls_2026_09_01_4", "filename": "Y_THEORY_LIVING_SOURCE_RELATIONAL_INDUCTION_SYNC_YLS-2026.09.01.4.zip", "sha256": "e6730bc992ddc6dc7eea11fc9fb229312ce57dfcdb9aacd021a5923e1cf5cfc5", "size_bytes": 68446838, "claimed_release": "YLS-2026.09.01.4", "bytes_present_in_living_source": false, "disposition": "retain_by_hash_only_do_not_install_or_overlay" }, { "archive_id": "standalone_relational_induction_simulator_v2", "filename": "Y_THEORY_RELATIONAL_INDUCTION_SIMULATOR_V2.zip", "sha256": "9ae1166e72e2caff50ed9df3e3183d82c12e750980e3344a8a3780d282dd8f90", "size_bytes": 27905, "bytes_present_in_living_source": false, "lineage_result": "all_nine_files_byte_identical_to_embedded_sync_archive_copy", "independent_replication": false, "disposition": "retain_by_hash_only_as_one_candidate_evidence_lineage" } ], "package_integrity": { "outer_archive_hashes_match_intake": true, "internal_file_manifest": { "declared_rows": 178, "matching_rows": 102, "mismatching_rows": 76, "unlisted_archive_files": 360, "result": "failed" }, "release_manifest": { "declared_hashes": 11, "incorrect_hashes": 4, "result": "failed" }, "approval_state": { "approval_templates_checked": 3, "all_blank": true, "signature_confirmation": false, "v52_in_latest_approved": false, "result": "not_approved" }, "installable_authority": false }, "independent_replay": [ { "model": "v1_physical_representative", "tests_passed": 17, "tests_total": 17, "earned_scope": "declared idealized Faraday_RLC_reciprocal_motor_and_mutual_induction_representative", "not_earned": "canonical_Y_Engine_operator_or_Mind_semantics" }, { "model": "v2_relational_induction_candidate", "tests_passed": 9, "tests_total": 9, "earned_scope": "reproduction_of_archived_nominal_candidate_checks", "not_earned": "independent_replication_causal_trace_memory_reciprocal_linkage_or_Mind_level_claims" } ], "model_findings": [ { "finding_id": "RI-F1", "severity": "blocking_for_claim", "statement": "The open-path run has zero current while retaining nonzero RMS emf, so changing linkage establishes induced drive rather than flow by itself; circulation additionally requires a compatible path and state law.", "required_repair": "Type drive, path, carrier, orientation, derivative, reference, and falsifier separately." }, { "finding_id": "RI-F2", "severity": "blocking_for_claim", "statement": "The V2 trace variable is causally inert with respect to coupling, current, and flux; the implementation is current-to-path-strength plasticity, not trace-to-structure memory.", "required_repair": "Make retained history causally affect a standardized future replay and demonstrate it by ablation." }, { "finding_id": "RI-F3", "severity": "blocking_for_claim", "statement": "V2 mechanical feedback is an independent term rather than the return direction of the declared linkage; mechanics still changes when turns and flux are zero.", "required_repair": "Use an energy-consistent shared coupling or explicitly type the feedback as a separate relation." }, { "finding_id": "RI-F4", "severity": "material_model_defect", "statement": "The Python constructor initializes flux inconsistently with its nonzero starting geometry, causing an artificial first-step emf; the browser initializes differently.", "required_repair": "Initialize every derived state from the same declared pre-step state and add Python-browser parity fixtures." }, { "finding_id": "RI-F5", "severity": "material_evidence_defect", "statement": "Export rows combine pre-step flux and angle difference with post-step angles and coupling.", "required_repair": "Export one coherent transaction snapshot with explicit pre/post state typing." }, { "finding_id": "RI-F6", "severity": "scope_gap", "statement": "The derivation introduces a general relation matrix while the implementation uses only scalar cosine coupling and omits matrix, nullspace, dimensional-transduction, and magnitude controls.", "required_repair": "Implement and test the declared operator or narrow the derivation to the scalar model." }, { "finding_id": "RI-F7", "severity": "proof_boundary", "statement": "No simulator test establishes thought, meaning, whole-level integration, observerhood, consciousness, or a neuroscience mapping.", "required_repair": "Keep structural analogy distinct from literal identity and design proposition-specific evidence before promotion." } ], "wisdom_dispositions": [ { "wisdom_id": "V52-001", "archive_title": "Change of Relation Induces a New Flow", "disposition": "duplicate", "canonical_promotion": false, "reason": "The current author intake preserves a narrower and physically correct candidate: change of a declared oriented relation may induce directed consequence; drive is not automatically flow." }, { "wisdom_id": "V52-002", "archive_title": "Continuity Circuit", "disposition": "duplicate", "canonical_promotion": false, "reason": "Existing renewal, residue, return, reinforcement, leakage, and path structure already carries the wisdom; RLC remains one typed physical representative." }, { "wisdom_id": "V52-003", "archive_title": "Repeated Trace Becomes Active Coupling Structure", "disposition": "duplicate_as_wisdom_reject_v2_as_proof", "canonical_promotion": false, "reason": "The causal criterion is already in current intake, but V2 does not feed trace into coupling or future behavior." }, { "wisdom_id": "V52-004", "archive_title": "Motor-Generator Reciprocity", "disposition": "revise", "canonical_promotion": false, "reason": "Retain V1 as an idealized physical representative while preserving separately typed directions, histories, carriers, and evidence; V2 does not implement reciprocal linkage." }, { "wisdom_id": "V52-005", "archive_title": "Thought as Organized Relational Flow", "disposition": "defer", "canonical_promotion": false, "reason": "Retain only the guardrail that thought is not electron flow; positive thought-current or whole-closure claims need neural carrier, semantic, integration, and causal-return evidence." } ], "guardrails": [ "Do not install or overlay the historical synchronization archive.", "Do not count the standalone V2 archive as independent replication.", "Do not promote V52-001 through V52-005 from this archive.", "Do not relabel the current sine phase-difference G4 candidate as Faraday induction.", "Do not identify thought with electron flow.", "Do preserve the author insight as a typed candidate about changing oriented relation, directed consequence, renewable path, retained residue, and returned effect." ], "next_gates": [ "Repair initialization and coherent pre/post transaction export.", "Separate induced drive from realized flow with an explicit open-path null.", "Implement causal retained-history ablation before claiming trace memory.", "Use energy-consistent reciprocal coupling or type each direction as a distinct relation.", "Bind every promoted claim to current author source, exact executable bytes, falsifiers, and proof scope." ] }