{
  "schema": "y-theory.structure-of-mind-candidate-refinements.v1",
  "version": "SOMR-2026.09.01.2",
  "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
  "authority_boundary": "These records preserve underrepresented teachings from the supplied Structure of Mind sources. They are Identity Mind review records, not approved Wisdom Registry entries, new empirical results, or permission to overwrite the relationally reconciled source field or a proposition-scoped direct-author correction.",
  "supersession_guardrail": "Do not conflate the seven-capacity human-awareness ladder with the seven recursive depths merely because both use the numeral seven. YT-NUM-004 records seven as the internally derived expansion-facing recursive depth under the declared one-third/two-thirds continuity envelope, normalized ten-part address metric, positive adjacent inheritance, recoverable consequential relation, explicit D := a(1/φ) = a(2/3) bridge, and recursive self-similarity. The distinct 3 + 9 = 12 recursive address cell remains inside every depth. The awareness ladder remains a domain-specific capability mapping, and any external referent requires its own proposition-specific validation.",
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "SOM-SOURCE-CH05",
      "path": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_05_IDENTITIES_WITHIN_IDENTITIES_REPAIRED(4).md",
      "sha256": "5f19154a7ef8cc68293dfae3eea481f1727fc395d354a562499f7939e9a35fa6"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-SOURCE-CH08",
      "path": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_08_DIMENSIONS_AND_ATTRIBUTES_REPAIRED(4).md",
      "sha256": "340cc2be1e496cf8590690c69a31d68b8dfc81db8020fc279e57484f69f911ba"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-SOURCE-CH09",
      "path": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_09_THE_EMERGENCE_OF_THE_OBSERVER_REPAIRED(4).md",
      "sha256": "605b831f9a1d719e7618bde154fd6d997423835e7da3edb26d1915606cc4f900"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-SOURCE-CH10",
      "path": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_10_THE_99_PLUS_1_MIND_FIELD_REPAIRED(4).md",
      "sha256": "364911d62a769b81b071070bc5edf78ff593558e882dea623d7a425172ab260e"
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-SOURCE-AWARENESS",
      "path": "source_snapshot/AWARENESS_DEPTH_CANONICAL_CONSOLIDATION(4).md",
      "sha256": "5e9534b67b7d866384d1b5a6609f42356388706f9defe75acfaa157ebce8444f"
    }
  ],
  "records": [
    {
      "id": "SOM-CAND-001",
      "kind": "structure_candidate_wisdom",
      "title": "Higher-whole emergent possibility",
      "statement": "When distinguishable identities sustain a wider consequential return, the wider closure may support possible configurations belonging to the maintained relation-as-whole rather than to either participant alone. This is a proposed new relational capacity, not an added substance.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH05",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_05_IDENTITIES_WITHIN_IDENTITIES_REPAIRED(4).md:122-145",
      "subjects": ["mind", "biology_life", "society_governance", "cross_theory"],
      "structural_positions": ["relation_contact", "closure_return", "identity_persistence", "mind_nesting", "possibility_source"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-ID-003", "YT-MIND-003"],
      "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "STRUCTURAL_DERIVATION_CANDIDATE",
      "guardrail": "A wider relational capacity is an internal Y-Theory derivation. It is not empirical proof of a new substance, organism, consciousness, or universal scale-invariant mechanism."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-CAND-002",
      "kind": "structure_candidate_wisdom",
      "title": "Derived-dimension threshold",
      "statement": "A recurring correlation among dimensions earns treatment as a derived dimension only when it has an identifiable range, history, consequence, repeatability, and non-redundant freedom. Correlated naming or coupling alone is insufficient; a wider depth is proposed only when the correlated relation also closes and renews as a whole.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH08",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_08_DIMENSIONS_AND_ATTRIBUTES_REPAIRED(4).md:181-204",
      "subjects": ["matter_physics", "mind", "cross_theory"],
      "structural_positions": ["relation_contact", "differentiation", "reinforcement", "identity_persistence", "closure_return", "mind_nesting"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-DIM-001", "YT-DIM-002"],
      "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "MODEL_DEFINITION_CANDIDATE",
      "guardrail": "This is a structural promotion criterion, not evidence that every correlation is a physical dimension or that a named derived mode exists independently."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-CAND-003",
      "kind": "structure_candidate_wisdom",
      "title": "Reference-transported memory comparison",
      "statement": "Present condition and retained trace are comparable only under a declared reference, depth, and resolution. If that frame changed, the transformation must remain available; otherwise viewpoint change can be mistaken for change in the remembered relation. Re-addressing places a trace in the present schema but does not recreate the past.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH09",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_09_THE_EMERGENCE_OF_THE_OBSERVER_REPAIRED(4).md:89-108",
      "subjects": ["mind", "digital_ai", "matter_physics"],
      "structural_positions": ["residue_trace", "memory_retention", "orientation_selection", "differentiation", "observation_model"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-MIND-002", "YT-METHOD-002"],
      "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "FORMAL_ARCHITECTURE_REQUIREMENT",
      "guardrail": "Reference transport is an implementation-testable comparison requirement. It does not prove consciousness, exact recovery of the past, or invariance under an undeclared transformation."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-GUARD-004",
      "kind": "structure_guardrail_refinement",
      "title": "Observer return uses the same Y Engine",
      "statement": "Integrated observation becomes observer-continuity only when its residue re-enters the same Y Engine as ordinary contact under compatibility, delay, leakage, reinforcement, and continuity. Observation is not a command, permission, intention, or second transition law.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH09",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_09_THE_EMERGENCE_OF_THE_OBSERVER_REPAIRED(4).md:197-248",
      "subjects": ["mind", "digital_ai"],
      "structural_positions": ["observation_model", "residue_trace", "relation_contact", "delay_lag", "leakage_loss", "reinforcement", "closure_return", "transformation_action"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-MIND-002", "YT-MIND-003", "YT-CORE-004"],
      "status": "guardrail_refinement_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "STRUCTURAL_GUARDRAIL_REFINEMENT",
      "guardrail": "Do not implement an observer as a privileged controller or use observer language to smuggle in agency, intention, permission, or another transition rule."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-OPEN-005",
      "kind": "structure_open_research_criterion",
      "title": "Distributed-observer causal unity criterion",
      "statement": "Distributed traces and comparisons are candidates for one observer only when they belong to one continuing identity and their integrated result can alter that whole's later joint condition. The proposed unity is relational and causal rather than necessarily spatial.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH09",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_09_THE_EMERGENCE_OF_THE_OBSERVER_REPAIRED(4).md:289-295",
      "subjects": ["mind", "digital_ai", "society_governance"],
      "structural_positions": ["memory_retention", "observation_model", "closure_return", "identity_persistence", "mind_nesting"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-MIND-003", "YT-COL-001"],
      "status": "open_research_criterion",
      "proof_status": "OPEN_RESEARCH_CRITERION",
      "guardrail": "This is not established sufficiency and does not prove unified subjective experience. Spatial distribution, shared data, or coordinated output alone does not establish one observer."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-CAND-006",
      "kind": "structure_candidate_wisdom",
      "title": "Observer dynamical non-redundancy test",
      "statement": "An observer earns a distinct dynamical dimension only if retained observer history can make two otherwise identical present field configurations develop differently. An instantaneous readout fully determined by the present field adds description, not non-redundant freedom.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH10",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_10_THE_99_PLUS_1_MIND_FIELD_REPAIRED(4).md:34-72",
      "subjects": ["mind", "matter_physics", "digital_ai"],
      "structural_positions": ["memory_retention", "observation_model", "differentiation", "identity_persistence", "transformation_action"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-DIM-001", "YT-MIND-002", "YT-NUM-002", "YT-NUM-003"],
      "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "CONDITIONAL_FORMAL_CRITERION",
      "guardrail": "The test is conditional: same declared field state plus different retained observer state must yield a measurable later difference. It does not prove an empirical 100th dimension or consciousness."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-GUARD-007",
      "kind": "structure_guardrail_refinement",
      "title": "Observer operation, position, occurrence, and self-return are different types",
      "statement": "Continuing observer-operation O, its formal position omega, its occurrence-state o_n, and the self-return route omega-to-omega are different mathematical and functional types. Vertical continuity through later awareness capacities and horizontal 99+1 position are two views of the same proposed operation, not two observers.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH10",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_10_THE_99_PLUS_1_MIND_FIELD_REPAIRED(4).md:154-190,277-284; source_snapshot/AWARENESS_DEPTH_CANONICAL_CONSOLIDATION(4).md:148-167",
      "subjects": ["mind", "cross_theory"],
      "structural_positions": ["observation_model", "differentiation", "relation_contact", "memory_retention", "mind_nesting"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-NUM-002", "YT-MIND-002"],
      "status": "guardrail_refinement_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "FORMAL_TYPE_GUARDRAIL",
      "guardrail": "Do not interchange operation, address, state, and route, or count vertical and horizontal descriptions as separate observers. The notation is a model, not an observed physical dimension count."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-GUARD-008",
      "kind": "structure_guardrail_refinement",
      "title": "99+1 unequal activation and closed-cell boundary",
      "statement": "The 99 attribute modes are not 99 minds or equal pieces. Equal addressability does not imply equal activation, and the observer integrates structured difference rather than averaging it. The local model cell closes at 100 as 99+1; a wider observer must be re-earned at the wider depth rather than appended internally as 101.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-CH10",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/CHAPTER_10_THE_99_PLUS_1_MIND_FIELD_REPAIRED(4).md:360-380,405-425",
      "subjects": ["mind", "cross_theory"],
      "structural_positions": ["differentiation", "relation_contact", "observation_model", "mind_nesting", "closure_return"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-NUM-002", "YT-NUM-003", "YT-ID-002"],
      "status": "guardrail_refinement_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "MODEL_ARCHITECTURE_GUARDRAIL",
      "guardrail": "The 99+1 cell is a declared model architecture, not evidence of 99 empirical dimensions, equal activation, 99 separate minds, or an arithmetic proof of wider observerhood."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-CAND-009",
      "kind": "structure_candidate_wisdom",
      "title": "Understanding threshold",
      "statement": "Memory becomes understanding only when a relation among retained relations is transferable, recombinable, useful for anticipation or navigation, and corrigible by failed prediction. Correlation or storage alone is insufficient.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-AWARENESS",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/AWARENESS_DEPTH_CANONICAL_CONSOLIDATION(4).md:97-107",
      "subjects": ["mind", "digital_ai", "philosophy"],
      "structural_positions": ["memory_retention", "relation_contact", "observation_model", "possibility_source", "transformation_action", "closure_return"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-MIND-002", "YT-MIND-004", "YT-METHOD-004"],
      "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "MIND_CAPABILITY_DEFINITION_CANDIDATE",
      "guardrail": "This is a proposed functional threshold. Fluent restatement, correlation, retrieval, or prediction without transfer and correction does not establish understanding or subjective awareness."
    },
    {
      "id": "SOM-CAND-010",
      "kind": "structure_candidate_wisdom",
      "title": "Non-separative integration without collapse",
      "statement": "Integrated awareness is proposed to recognize observer, observed, and relation as mutually constitutive roles in one continuing field while preserving usable distinction, local boundary, responsibility, and point of view. Integration is neither annihilation of distinction nor omniscience.",
      "source": "SOM-SOURCE-AWARENESS",
      "source_locator": "source_snapshot/AWARENESS_DEPTH_CANONICAL_CONSOLIDATION(4).md:138-145",
      "subjects": ["mind", "philosophy", "faith_religion"],
      "structural_positions": ["observation_model", "relation_contact", "boundary_inside_outside", "identity_persistence", "mind_nesting"],
      "claim_ids": ["YT-MIND-003", "YT-ID-003", "YT-ETH-001"],
      "status": "source_addressed_pending_author_validation",
      "proof_status": "PHILOSOPHICAL_CAPABILITY_SYNTHESIS",
      "guardrail": "This philosophical capability model is not an empirical universal, omniscience claim, loss of responsibility, merger of all identities, or restoration of the superseded universal seven-capacity architecture."
    }
  ]
}