Y TheoryThe Compass of Reality

Projects → bounded action → measured return

Actions are tools inside the projects—not the project map itself.

Start in Projects to understand which responsibility owns the work. Then use a public template here to preserve the proposition and boundary; a signed-in challenge must supply the missing identity, scale, beneficiary, baseline, rivals, evidence, cost, stop rule, owner, and return path.

Start with the portfolio

Find the project before opening an action.

Open Y-Theory Projects →Locate it in the Identity Atlas

One shared change cycle

Receive. Relate. Act. Measure. Return.

Each instance must identify the acting identity and its outside context, then preserve the relation that carries intervention, consequence, evidence, cost, and return. Nothing is promoted merely because the template exists.

  1. 01Situation

    Bind an exact source, acting identity, outside context, scale, and beneficiary.

  2. 02Relation

    Declare variables, baseline, rival explanations, consent, and authority.

  3. 03Intervention

    Choose one bounded action with cost, ownership, and a stop rule.

  4. 04Consequence

    Record evidence against success and failure criteria, including nulls and harm.

  5. 05Return

    Close, replicate, correct, or propose a new action through the declared return path.

Governed public templates

Known structure is visible. Unknown structure stays open.

These are public reusable templates, not private executions. Template presence, project mapping, or source linkage establishes neither evidence, successful action, canonical approval, nor proof of Y-Theory.

0114 instance fields open

AC-teaching · not instantiated

Teaching

Proposition
A relational sequence may improve comprehension without asking learners to accept the whole framework.
Bounded action
Teach one concept, compare understanding before and after, and record confusion rather than smoothing it away.
Declared measure
Transfer, explanation quality, retained distinctions, and correction rate.
Does not prove
Improved teaching does not prove the ontology.
Project mapping
PRJ-011
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityThe architecture names a teaching domain, not an accountable acting identity.
  • scaleNo operational teaching scale is fixed in the architecture.
  • beneficiaryLearners are mentioned, but no bounded beneficiary population is defined.
  • variablesThe architecture does not operationally define variables.
  • baselineA before-and-after comparison is requested, but no baseline procedure or value is declared.
  • rivalsNo rival teaching explanation is enumerated.
  • success criterionMeasures are named without a threshold for success.
  • failure criterionNo operational failure threshold is declared.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no execution evidence.
  • costNo cost model is declared.
  • stop ruleNo stop rule is declared.
  • closureNo closure condition is declared.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private instance owner.
  • return pathNo instance-specific return destination is declared.
Load governed draft →10_PROJECTS.md · 12-y-theory-teacher ↗PROJECT_REGISTRY.json · id=PRJ-011 ↗
0214 instance fields open

AC-formal-research · not instantiated

Formal research

Proposition
One claim can be isolated from the wider narrative and made genuinely falsifiable.
Bounded action
Freeze premises, variables, rival explanations, data, stop rules, and the result that would count as zero.
Declared measure
Discriminating prediction, reproducibility, error discovery, and useful nulls.
Does not prove
One supported claim does not prove every domain bridge.
Project mapping
The registry contains multiple research-bearing projects, and the application architecture does not identify one project as its exact owner.
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityThe architecture does not name an accountable research identity.
  • scaleNo operational research scale is fixed.
  • beneficiaryNo bounded beneficiary is declared.
  • variablesVariables must be frozen by a future instance; none are supplied by the template.
  • baselineNo concrete comparison baseline is supplied.
  • rivalsRival explanations are required by the action but not enumerated.
  • success criterionNo claim-specific success threshold is supplied.
  • failure criterionA zero result must be defined by a future instance; it is not defined here.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no execution evidence.
  • costNo cost model is declared.
  • stop ruleStop rules are required by the action but no concrete rule is supplied.
  • closureNo claim-specific closure condition is declared.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private instance owner.
  • return pathNo instance-specific review or correction destination is declared.
Load governed draft →11_METHOD.md · 6-the-zero-to-one-challenge-protocol ↗10_PROJECTS.md · 18-scientific-and-cross-domain-validation ↗
0314 instance fields open

AC-quran-audit · not instantiated

Qur’an structural audit

Proposition
A frozen structural hypothesis can be compared transparently with immutable Arabic text.
Bounded action
Declare the text, annotation rules, rival analyses, nulls, exclusions, and independent review before computation.
Declared measure
Annotation agreement, robustness to rivals, preregistered fit, null frequency, and reproducibility.
Does not prove
Pattern fit does not prove revelation, decoded Divine intent, or physics.
Project mapping
PRJ-015
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityThe architecture names an audit domain, not an accountable audit identity.
  • scaleNo textual unit or corpus scale is fixed.
  • beneficiaryNo bounded beneficiary is declared.
  • variablesAnnotation rules are requested but no variables are operationally defined.
  • baselineNo comparison baseline is supplied.
  • rivalsRival analyses are required by the action but not enumerated.
  • success criterionNo preregistered success threshold is supplied.
  • failure criterionNulls are required by the action but no failure threshold is supplied.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no audit evidence.
  • costNo cost model is declared.
  • stop ruleNo stop rule is declared.
  • closureNo closure condition is declared.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private audit owner.
  • return pathNo instance-specific independent-review return destination is declared.
Load governed draft →07_FAITH.md · 11-quranic-structural-and-computational-research ↗PROJECT_REGISTRY.json · id=PRJ-015 ↗
0414 instance fields open

AC-agent-continuity · not instantiated

Agent continuity

Proposition
A source hierarchy and return protocol may reduce context loss across human–agent work.
Bounded action
Recover the active relation field and any proposition-scoped correction, declare current status, make one bounded change, and leave a verified return record.
Declared measure
Contradiction rate, recovered decisions, handoff completeness, and time to trustworthy continuation.
Does not prove
Continuity architecture does not make a software agent conscious.
Project mapping
The architecture overlaps One Source / Knowledge DNA, Y-Theory Teacher, and AdvisoryMind, but it does not identify one registry project as its exact owner.
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityNo specific human–agent work identity is named.
  • scaleNo handoff or project scale is fixed.
  • beneficiaryNo bounded beneficiary is declared.
  • variablesThe architecture does not operationally define variables.
  • baselineNo comparison baseline is supplied.
  • rivalsNo rival continuity process is enumerated.
  • success criterionMeasures are named without a success threshold.
  • failure criterionNo operational failure threshold is declared.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no handoff evidence.
  • costNo cost model is declared.
  • stop ruleThe bounded-change phrase does not specify an operational stop rule.
  • closureA verified return record is requested, but no closure criteria are supplied.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private continuity owner.
  • return pathThe action requires a return record but does not declare its instance-specific destination.
Load governed draft →12_LIVING_SOURCE.md · 6-required-agent-behaviour ↗
0514 instance fields open

AC-community-food · not instantiated

Community food

Proposition
Food surplus and household need can be related without erasing dignity, local knowledge, or responsibility.
Bounded action
Map supply, need, timing, safety, transport, consent, and return one measurable intervention.
Declared measure
Food diverted, households served, quality, repeat participation, cost, and waste displacement.
Does not prove
A service outcome validates the intervention, not all of Y-Theory.
Project mapping
The architecture could relate to Community Intelligence Network / NAPAM or SocialFork, but it does not identify one registry project as its exact owner.
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityNo accountable intervention identity is named.
  • scaleNo locality, duration, or participant scale is fixed.
  • beneficiaryHousehold need is mentioned, but no bounded beneficiary population is defined.
  • variablesCandidate factors are named but not operationally defined as variables.
  • baselineNo current-state food baseline is supplied.
  • rivalsNo rival intervention is enumerated.
  • success criterionMeasures are named without a success threshold.
  • failure criterionNo operational harm or failure threshold is declared.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no intervention evidence.
  • costCost is named as a measure but no cost model or value is declared.
  • stop ruleNo stop rule is declared.
  • closureNo closure condition is declared.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private intervention owner.
  • return pathThe action requests return but supplies no instance-specific destination.
Load governed draft →10_PROJECTS.md · 15-community-intelligence-network--napam ↗
0614 instance fields open

AC-community-os · not instantiated

Community intelligence

Proposition
Needs, offers, memory, action, verification, and correction can form a healthier local coordination loop.
Bounded action
Co-design one small Amherst/Cumberland loop with participants, consent, ownership, and stop rules.
Declared measure
Need resolution, waste reduced, access improved, participant control, and unintended harm.
Does not prove
A successful pilot does not prove a conscious collective Mind.
Project mapping
PRJ-014
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityNo accountable pilot identity is named.
  • scaleA small local loop is requested, but no participant count, duration, or operational boundary is fixed.
  • beneficiaryParticipants are mentioned, but no bounded beneficiary group is defined.
  • variablesThe architecture does not operationally define variables.
  • baselineNo current-state coordination baseline is supplied.
  • rivalsNo rival coordination process is enumerated.
  • success criterionMeasures are named without a success threshold.
  • failure criterionUnintended harm is named as a measure but no failure threshold is declared.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no pilot evidence.
  • costNo cost model is declared.
  • stop ruleStop rules are requested by the action but no concrete rule is supplied.
  • closureNo closure condition is declared.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private pilot owner.
  • return pathNo instance-specific verification and correction destination is declared.
Load governed draft →08_COLLECTIVE.md · 12-community-intelligence-network--napam ↗PROJECT_REGISTRY.json · id=PRJ-014 ↗
0714 instance fields open

AC-runtime-r-and-d · not instantiated

Runtime R&D

Proposition
Contact, lag, residue, recurrence, and return can be implemented as measurable computational operators.
Bounded action
Run one controlled benchmark against a simpler baseline and preserve negative or rejected results.
Declared measure
Prediction, adaptation, stability, resource cost, failure modes, and replication.
Does not prove
Behavioral performance does not establish subjective consciousness.
Project mapping
PRJ-008
Inspect 14 required instance declarations
  • identityNo benchmarked runtime identity or version is named.
  • scaleNo workload, dataset, or run scale is fixed.
  • beneficiaryNo bounded beneficiary is declared.
  • variablesOperators are named, but benchmark variables are not operationally defined.
  • baselineA simpler baseline is required by the action but not specified.
  • rivalsNo rival implementation is enumerated.
  • success criterionMeasures are named without a success threshold.
  • failure criterionNegative and rejected results must be preserved, but no benchmark-specific failure threshold is supplied.
  • evidence locatorsA public template contains no benchmark evidence.
  • costResource cost is named as a measure but no cost model or value is declared.
  • stop ruleNo run stop rule is declared.
  • closureNo benchmark closure condition is declared.
  • ownerA reusable public template has no private benchmark owner.
  • return pathNo instance-specific result and correction destination is declared.
Load governed draft →09_DIGITAL.md · 6-current-native-runtime-evidence ↗PROJECT_REGISTRY.json · id=PRJ-008 ↗

Audit the contract

Every challenge uses the same recoverable skeleton.

Open the strict schemaOpen the Challenge Lab →
Related paths and page provenance